*Update: Obviously xiaxue is once again ABUSING her access to a larger audience to poison the well and cast doubt on the credibility of this site and any others that hold views opposing to hers. I trust that regular readers of this site are able to figure out the truth. My condolences to those who have already been brain-washed beyond repair.
The current situation is that wendy cheng is alleging that the email forwarded to me by Ethan, kingoftears@gmail.com, is fake because Kimage's Director, Monica, did not respond to this email in THAT way. I have added a disclaimer to the entry containing the screenshot of the email. In case you guys are lazy to click on the link or scroll down, I will reproduce it in this entry:
"Disclaimer: Please read the contents of this entry carefully. The following mail was forwarded to me by one of the readers of this site, whose email address is kingoftears@gmail.com. He had expressed concern to kimage through enquiry@kimage.com.sg (NOT the direct mail to Kimage's Director, Monica) about xiaxue being their spokeswoman. Nobody said that the reply was from Kimage's Director, Monica. To check the authencity of the email and to check which employee in Kimage's customer support responded to this email, Kimage can refer to the reference number "Kimage Customer Services - Ref# 0005-25OCT05" and its subsequent logs. If Kimage can produce proof that the email was faked by kingoftears@gmail.com, you can contact me directly at xialanxue@gmail.com to politely ask me to remove the screenshot of the email from this entry."
DISCLAIMER: YOU AGREE TO BEAR FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTENT POSTED BY YOU. THE AUTHOR OF THIS SITE DOES NOT MONITOR OR EDIT THE CONTENT AND IS NOT RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR (1) ANY CONTENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY INFRINGING, INACCURATE, OBSCENE, INDECENT, THREATENING, OFFENSIVE, DEFAMATORY, TORTIOUS, OR ILLEGAL CONTENT, OR (2) ANY THIRD PARTY CONDUCT, TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
141 comments:
Dude, already forwarded the screenshot of my copy of the email to you liao. I too sent it to Enquiry@Kimage.
Of course the director of the company would not be replying to those emails herself lah right!?
If Monica really has a problem, then maybe she should be talking to her staff that checks the emails at that address. Don't come and kaopeh-kaobu with us.
Unless of course XX is just making this all up. Hmmm. ;)
Oh no.. i am so upset Kimage is not droppping her.
You have to sympathise with Kimage and Voxy for getting caught in the crossfire. I'm sure they never expected (and certainly never wanted) to be part of blog war.
If they sponsor Wendy, they get stick from her critics; if they drop her, they get stick from her rabid fans. I certainly don't envy their position right now. =)
I guess asking Wendy NOT to put their banner up was some kind of compromise--though I'm not sure they knew Wendy was going to make that public as well on her blog.... When will the girl learn to shut up? =)
Thought her comments, about Voxy not happy with her use of vulgarities, was a wee bit sarcastic and uncalled for. Oh well, at least she left out her trademark "*roll eyes*".
Just to add, while Wendy should keep any correspondence with her sponsors off public view, so should her critics.
Either way it's bad publicity for these companies, and critics have every duty to help protect their image too, especially when they have the moral courage to drop Wendy.
simplesandra: We do applaud Voxy and Kimage for their courage. The point with showing the emails is to correct what Wendy has said about the companies themselves.
But point graciously taken. :)
If endorsing XX is bringing them more sales and up their company's image positively, I'm sure two emails are not going to affect their decision to continue endorsing her.
I wonder if Voxy did not drop her, will she feel confined and restricted as she stated so or she will still be happy being their spokeperson? After reading what she wrote on Voxy, I'm sure other companies will think twice to offer her an endorsements.
To her, the company is betraying her for not continuing the endorsement deals. BUT she has never reflected if she has play a good role in keeping the company's image and promoting their sales. She is never in the wrong eh?
WC is such an hypocrite. In one of her earlier post, she claims that she is cutting down on vulgarities because the mother doesn't like it..blah..blah..blah... The actual fact is that she was concerned about the negative impact on her endorsements deals.
Now that the endorsements r gone, she is back to her old ways. What a liar.
If i hv a daughter like WC, I too will dump the family
she better keep her gob shut or Voxy might sue her for brand erosion. talk about an ungrateful piece of.....
shit? well that's our WC (Wendy Cheng)
mooniess wrote: "simplesandra: We do applaud Voxy and Kimage for their courage. The point with showing the emails is to correct what Wendy has said about the companies themselves."
Point graciously taken too. =)
Listerine should maybe have her as spokeswoman - she needs a mouth wash.
KM is still endorsing her? When did they become her same type. I think both have 2 faces.
time to send more emails to the sponsors then... :)
It's very easy to flood someone's email. 1 day send about 100? they will soon get tired of it. XiaXue is not pretty. Her features are just average. And KM can get even better spokeperson than XiaXue.
Who here knows LB? Their shirts are just average. Oh well, Same as VX and KM. All does not make it famous. If not they would not find such a cheapskate.
xlx, try harder la..u can't get her down so easily.
i have been posting my comments at Kimage advertsing agent site http://www.shoutz.com/public/modules/ipboard/index.php?act=ST&f=14&t=2220&s=d63987b7da78a95100e02e10ac3e2565
But still can't hear anything from Kimage representative yet :(
I wonder when r they going to show some much anticiapted responses.
Actually is very easy to get her down. Like many people said, she is a hypocrite and her income depends on her endorsements. So, email will affect her income. Just write more and more lor. Write not enough than use call lor. What you expect? Blogging can't earn much just by donations and endorsements you know. Somemore take photo also need $$. Think so easy meh. I think she will get bankkrupt soon. Touch wood. But serious.
WC's best bet is to marry a $$$ guy as her ticket out of "poverty". She shd work harder on that..instead of trying to write.
I think Joker Cheng is only allowing good comments about her to be seen in her most recent post. Think she is trying to 'bluff' her endorsers who will most likely be checking her website more frequently now into believing that pple actually love her.
She's really in a deluded state of mind.
if u dislike her so much y waste ur time readin her blog? i think ur just purely jealous. biatch~
" if u dislike her so much y waste ur time readin her blog? i think ur just purely jealous. biatch~ "
jealous that so many ppl dislike her? jealous that she does not even hold a full time job? jealous that she is ill-bred and proud that she can string vulgarities together? jealous of some web blog award???
Come on..gimme a break. For starters, no one here fancy a so-blogger 'career' if there is such a thing in the first place... ..She can continue to build castles in the air since her head is still in the clouds..Geeze..
contridicting pice of shit.
will u create a blog for ppl u dislike and waste ur bloody precious time "reading" those LONG entries she wrote?
get a life.~
who u trying to prove?
assholees
so how? who is lying here? Kimage still endorsing her or not?
" get a life.~
who u trying to prove? "
not trying to prove anyone...it should be 'what r u trying to prove' not 'who'
Pls attend some grammer lessons..
and relax, ppl r reading her blog just to get entertained coz she is a joke :) never fail to amuse the crowd when WC is the only clown in town
Anonymous said...
contridicting pice of shit.
will u create a blog for ppl u dislike and waste ur bloody precious time "reading" those LONG entries she wrote?
get a life.~
who u trying to prove?
assholees
----------
Why are you here reading this blog if you hate it so much then?
did anyone see xiaxue's latest post???
hahah what on earth does discomfitted mean and what on earth is scrotchtape???? dont tell me people pay her to write for them.... (used to anyway)
Kenny Sia wrote : "Not by a long shot is she a positive role model for society. Neither are Britney Spears, Jolin Tsai, Paris Hilton or even Angelina Jolie (UN Ambassador/blood swapper/chain smoker/casual sex advocate)."
What a weak line of defense. And to compare WC with the real celebs??!! Has Kenny Sia been taking drugs??
If she is so famous why she just got interview only and not a contract to Mediacorp? And, Kenny Sia and the other bloggers are just acting pro of course not to XLX. I support her cause i am also anti xx.
And now is quite outdated to blog to get famous. Considering there is this looking for a star on channel 8 and the project superstar. All may be older than XX. But they got the X factor. Not all things come through writing. It's a talent and how you project your image. Notice those stars are well mannered and don't have hatred. Of course they have but they keep it inside and that makes them having multiples of fans. Scolding vulgarities all the time does not make a person with more fans although XX encounter lots of interesting stuff. And what Kenny Sia wrote, is crap. Yeah, scold more vulgarities. All hail the vulgarity princess. So what if she have left with maybe about 2 endorsements? Not on tv = not famous
kenny has no balls. xiaxue has no boobs. life is fair.
on a slightly serious note, has anyone seen such vehemence protest over kottke's patrons? no? but the guy left his job to be a full time blogger!
no one is jealous enough of kottke?? but his daily hits are more than xiaxue's, and he is an A list blogger!
food for thought indeed.
Heh, Kennysia is like xiaxues PR. He always defends her.
I'm pretty tired and i think all that needs to be said has been said. But seriously though, read this. Its awesome: http://www.suanie.net/category/for-xs-sake/
I still prefer her pink blog. That current blog looks very dull indeed
Why does Xiaxue want a premium haloscan account when she, apparently, can't afford it? Kenny Sia has to sponsor for her huh.
Look W.C., aka Water Closet, why get something you can't afford?
and oh yeah stop using that pathetic 'oh no i have a single parent family, oh no my brother is so young'line.
You're not the only one without a parent. And your fans are So gonna shoot back at me and go like, 'You evil bitch! You don't know how its like to have a single parent!' and the kind of nonsense Xiaxue blabbers.
Well I do understand. I have no mum.
gee relax lah, i see a lot of people posting emails of what they wrote to kimage and voxy on their blogs what. so defensive for what? no balls now, scared kenna sued issit?
i don't see her mentioning names too, so really, unless you have something to hide, i don't see why you should be so paranoid now to post disclaimers. even to the extent, of putting on the blame on poor king of tears. you are one of a kind, dude.
btw, correcting your posts, does that mean you are editing your posts, and by that, censoring free speech huh?
dawney, so? everyone's not in the same position. if it's hard on her, it might not be for you. everybody takes trauma/hardship differently. you apparently take it well, good on you, it doesn't mean she's trying to play the sympathy card.
and NO i am not a fan, i just think you are so out of the line.
"amused" xlx only added a disclaimer on top of the contents of his/her original post which is left unedited. I think xlx had to do this to prevent xiaxue from suceeding with her lies and accusations.
xiaxue on the other hand edits away "FUCKER" and "PIG" away from her racist post to destroy evidence.
There is a fucking big difference.
and how can adding a disclaimer equate to censoring free speech? Amused, the way you argue is so so soooooooooooo much like the way xiaxue argues - illogical. Could you be *gasp* her??
amused said...
dawney, so? everyone's not in the same position. if it's hard on her, it might not be for you. everybody takes trauma/hardship differently. you apparently take it well, good on you, it doesn't mean she's trying to play the sympathy card.
and NO i am not a fan, i just think you are so out of the line.
-----------------
If she is not trying to play the sypmathy card, what is the reasoning of dragging her single-parent family, young bro, poor, income affected into the matter?
and NO I am not a fan of xlx or anti-xx, but I just think you are not in line with the situation
leonard, no leh, i am not her. if i am her, i would have the stupid pic beside my post like she said so mah. she's stupid and foul mouthed, but at least she's not humji.
i learn to be hum ji, like the owner of this blog one what. anoymous, put disclaimer, and push the blame on king of tears. don't you think he's damn sick? using that taiwanese girl on his blog to sell sex, then don't even dare to say that's not him. PUI. and please lah, don't be so blinded by your hate of that pink poodle can? can't you see he's just putting the disclaimer so he won't be sued?
_________
anon ah, you come from single parent family meh? prior to that, i don't see her using it mah, but now, i think it really affects her, then she say mah, this sort of thing don't need to lie one what. also don't need sympathy one what. people don't give a shit about disabled people leh, you think people give a shit about her coming from single parent family meh? plus, her mother read her blog, sure du lan she lie to so many people that her family is broken if it's not, right?
not as if it's very glam to come from a single parent family. it's like having depression, but not wanting to come out and tell people, but in the end, you have to, because people keep thinking why the hell are you so screwed up one.
aye sian, i think i sound like a xiaxue fan. i am not leh. please don't abuse me hor.
amused wrote: "if it's hard on her, it might not be for you... and NO i am not a fan, i just think you are so out of the line. "
Wendy's profligate lifestyle is "hard on her"... gee, thanks. My life must be REAL miserable then. [*roll eyes*]
amused wrote: "not as if it's very glam to come from a single parent family. it's like having depression, but not wanting to come out and tell people, but in the end, you have to, because people keep thinking why the hell are you so screwed up one."
Now THAT's out of line. Who are you to say that kids from single-parent families are screwed up--unless you were refering to yourself?
For xx's fans, open your eyes and switch on your thinking cap and read this
http://www.suanie.net/2005/10/25/hello-xiaxue/
Not only this article, take some time to read all xx's entries with open eyes and working brain and you will realised what a lying cad she has been...
anon ah, you come from single parent family meh? prior to that, i don't see her using it mah, but now, i think it really affects her, then she say mah, this sort of thing don't need to lie one what. also don't need sympathy one what. people don't give a shit about disabled people leh, you think people give a shit about her coming from single parent family meh? plus, her mother read her blog, sure du lan she lie to so many people that her family is broken if it's not, right?
not as if it's very glam to come from a single parent family. it's like having depression, but not wanting to come out and tell people, but in the end, you have to, because people keep thinking why the hell are you so screwed up one.
aye sian, i think i sound like a xiaxue fan. i am not leh. please don't abuse me hor.
---------
You indeed sound like a xiaxue fan from the way you raised your points. I really don't understand what are you trying to put across and how your brain functions to link unrelated matters together.
amused you really amused people. WTF are you talking? I'm sure you come from single parent family one!
Fucking asshole, talk to xx's readers have to talk like no brain like that. Have to sound illogical and use broken english to talk to them and then they will drag every other no link things in the picture.
Idiotic
It ain't nice to talk 'bout your mom like that.
sandra, yeah. your life is very miserable what. fancy being so kaypoh to read all the comments here, and bothering to reply to everyone that annoys you. siao char bo!
sigh, and i didn't say children from single parent families are screwed up. i say people suffering from depression have to face that stigma, just like children from single-parent families. get it? don't know anything, but want to behave as if you know everything. tsk.
and the last anon, i spoke in singlish so i won't come across as so harsh, quit being a dumbfuck. and no, i don't come from a single-parent family, if that was an insult, i think you're really sad for having to go that low.
correction, not anonymous, but to wtfamused.
and yeah, to that anonymous, it was an analogy. another dumbfuck like sandra. hey, are you sandra's sidekick? or even, sandra herself? yeah, yeah, i know, not that sandra, but rather the parody one. *rolls eyes*
XX is so fake. Photoshop this and that. Even her face. A bit of originality also don't have. This is 1 kind that should be despise of. Not proud of their looks mah. Proud of herself being an adult? She is just 21. Immature of talking things that cause blog war. Even handicapped toilets also must say. I AGREE! Shut her up. Less spam also.
there is going to be a article tomrrow about her...saw todays paper...check my blog for details...i scanned the newspaper cutting...
another blogger in trouble
http://prawnking.blogspot.com/2005/10/another-blogger-in-trouble.html
She needs to get owned, that's the fact.
Heh, definitely needs to pwned.
I feel sorry for her mother actually, or Momo or whatever she calls her. Having to support a girl who leads a decadent (oh come on now, don't tell me whatever she does ISN'T decadent, I don't pull crap like that and I'm upper middle bloody class...) without (supposedly) having the means to support it. She's only starting out with her career and shes already trying to lead a socialite's life. Oh gosh, i take back what i said when i said shes like a whiny 20-something version of Sumiko Tan, shes much much worse.
I generally give a snort of derision to anyone who thinks BLOGGING and COMMERCIALISM can co-exist. That defeats the purpose of have a free medium of speech in the first place, and there is where XX has dug her own grave. Ah well. Curse? Can. Swear? Can. As long as you make like Maddox, who represents noone but himself and his overgrown testicles. (and is still pretty famous.) Heres a clue: for mass appeal, appeal to the general public and do your best not to repulse them. Paris MAY be famous, but shes definitely not respected, so whatshit is kenny sia trying to pull with that comparison? Heh.
So poor ah, go eat maggie mee lah.
dani wrote: "She's only starting out with her career and shes already trying to lead a socialite's life."
She hasn't even collected her diploma, has she? =)
dani wrote: "I generally give a snort of derision to anyone who thinks BLOGGING and COMMERCIALISM can co-exist."
Actually it can, but that depends on what the blog's about. For instnace, a blog dedicated to a hobby, say plastic modelling, can have sponsors from related brand names (like Tamiya, Hasegawa, Bandai etc), and if the guy running it is respected in that area, he can even endorse these products too. It's not that much different from hobby websites, but then again--different names, same principles.
However, for vanity blogging( especially the Wendy kind)... now that's a different story. =)
dani: agree about the comparisons that Kenny made. Like wtf!?
SimpleSandra wrote: However, for vanity blogging( especially the Wendy kind)... now that's a different story. =)
Can be commercialized too! Endorse products with a sexual appeal. Pose for FHM magazine to satisfy the horny bengs and desperate lao bengs, promote sexual products with sight and sound effects and encourage more and open sex at a younger age to promote the sales of condom(that is if she knows the importance of safe sex).
my god. is it me or is it i see some faithful, retarded and full of shits blog-ders of our DEAR WC typing in languages like BIATCH, ASSHOLEEES and stuffs like that? c'mon la. GROW UP.
admit that, WC screwed her both endorsement deals HERSELF.
IF she's endorsing any company, she should at least have the basic courtesy to stop her insults and stuffs. who cares if she does it privately.
she knows it very well herself, if she blogs about it, she will create alot of commotions and true enough, it did.
it's just the way how she carries herself infront of the public and the company.
true enough?
Hey, u should get the word verification thing. Avoids spams like 'road construction safety equipment'
Anyway, someone left me a link to your blog in mine. Thanks! U gave me a lot of good insight before i committed blog suicide.
I'm surprised there are guys who dislike xx, I thought she is the type who is appealing to most guys..
Barbie doll and revealing dress sense, full make-up, short petite, slutty look, vain, spice up your sexual fantasies with seductive language and body language and most importantly open to sex which can satisfy your sexual needs..
Are guys standard getting better and better nowadays? Cock doesn't stand up as long as they see a pair of tits regardless of how one looks above their shoulder and if she has a good heart behind the tits?
I do believe there are desperados around too..
no one here want to date her or want her as gf or secretly admire her?
hi hmmm....
I think you are surprised coz xx shows u a false picture of what ppl really think og her
I really thought she is the type that most guys will go for as it seems from her comments box and entries that there are so many guys who adore her like they have never seen a girl as pretty and as good as her.
I don't like her but it always surprised me why there are guys who like her. I wouldn't even want to have a friend like her..
Girls' views on a girl is always different from guys' views on the same girl......
hmmmm...... : she moderates her comments and deletes the bad ones. it's a well-known fact.
xiaxue's comments box and entries are definitely not representative of reality.
It's not only WC who is irritating but also the crowd she hangs out with... Freely uses vulgarities thinking it is cool..
http://botakgorrilla.blogspot.com/
Someone should write to NUS on what bad publicity this student brings to the university.
http://www.lalalapom.blogspot.com/
most boring blog ever who uses pics of her niece to drive traffic to her site. yawn :O
The things they write r so childish that I wonder these r primary sch kids.
Using vulgarities are just one's freedom in expressing their thoughts. Those are just her friends who have did nothing wrong. What makes you think that you are in a position to comment that they wrote childish stories. What even gives you the position to be judging them. What are you trying to do there? Encouraging others to be flaming them? This only show how much your character is worth.
ch
Ooh okay simplesandra, point noted.
Thing is poor wendy can't really pull it off well. Aww.
not to mention online travelogues and such. :)
"What makes you think that you are in a position to comment that they wrote childish stories. What even gives you the position to be judging them."
By whatever standards u use, one would find it childish to be writing those garbage at their age.
Their blog is on public media - the internet. That gives every reader a right to judge. i've only read it once and find it a total waste of my time. I rather watch the wet paint on the wall dry.
"Using vulgarities are just one's freedom in expressing their thoughts."
Ahhh...the freedom arguement again. The use of profanities just reflects on one's upbringing - ill-bred.
Her blog attracts more than 10,000 views daily based on her blog's counter. Besides her KL and the JC students entries, she is getting only an avg of 100 comments. Even the recent one where she is being dropped off the endorsements is getting lesser comments than the KL and JC's entries.
Everyone knows that she moderates comments allowing ONLY those nice nice comments to show. She deletes comments that reflect badly on her.
1. Does that mean there are more people leaving negative comments on her blog?
2. Does that mean there are more onlookers than fans? They don't give a damn fuck if she lost the endorsements or not.
"Using vulgarities are just one's freedom in expressing their thoughts."
Wow.. To think that one can only use the hokkien profanities excessively in order to express their thoughts....it tells u about the circle XX mixes with.....and not surprise y she behaves this way...
The use of profanities just reflects on one's upbringing - ill-bred.
So, you dare to say that you have never utter 1 vulgarity word in your life?
Vulgarities are just words used to express one's anger.
ch
Hmmm wrote, "I'm surprised there are guys who dislike xx, I thought she is the type who is appealing to most guys.."
Well, I am a guy & let me put it this way... If a guy wants to be a laughing stock amongst his friends, and want to drive his parents to their grave earlier....ya, he can bring XX home
ch : "Vulgarities are just words used to express one's anger."
Pls read those blogs again...it is not an just an expression of anger...they use it as part of their daily language...on almost everything. they even applaud and pay tribute to the ones who can string the longest vulgarities together. How dumb can one get?? Duh.
" no one here want to date her or want her as gf or secretly admire her? "
I believe she will appeal to the bengs...and unfortunately the bengs only.
Any guy with a decent taste would stay clear.
"1. Does that mean there are more people leaving negative comments on her blog?
2. Does that mean there are more onlookers than fans? They don't give a damn fuck if she lost the endorsements or not. "
1. I don't think there will be too many ppl leaving negative comments since they know it'll be blocked.
2. Most of the readers have better things to do in their real lives. Ppl read her blog just to get tickled how silly she is.
When she looks back a couple of years down the road on all these blogging stuff, she'll realize how stupid she was....or maybe not, her mentality froze after her PSLE.
I like to ask why XX is a laughing stock? That's quite mean but i don't get it too. Gals hate to be a laughing stock though i can say im not really her fan but it's sad to hear that.
Ya, she is a big fat meany with all her fans. And ive been to her blog and suddenly all the nice comments were there. Probably deleted a whole bunch of the comments. Hmm, people do change for the better so give people a chance to breathe.
I always laugh at people who boast about their PSLE results long after they have left school. It's quite sad that XX doesn't realise how insignificant these results are in the real world. People don't care anymore what you did at school - what matters are your life skills (like ability to handle pressure), which she has demonstrated that she has very little of.
people do change for the better so give people a chance to breathe.
----------
She doesn't deserve a chance when she doesn't give others a chance. She doesn't deserve to be forgiven when she doesn't understand what it is to be forgiving.
She doesn't deserve others understanding when she doesn't offer her understanding towards others.
She doesn't deserve respect when she doesn't respect others.
Obviously she is still proud of her own doing, full of herself and believes she is god's sent. Do you think she will change in a year or two time when all she wants to hear are people encouraging her to stay the same?
She has offended too many and I don't think she feels repentent or regret of her own actions at all. We aren't in the position to judge the rights and wrongs but we can voice out our own opinions on her. Don't you realise the oppositions from the public are greater but she insists she is never at fault.
Chances are not given by others but earned by self. :)
Anti wrote :"I like to ask why XX is a laughing stock?"
From XX's recent post
"My point is not that I don't have constructive topics and that I scold vulgarities (all the time) of course"
So here r some reasons, she
1. is vulgar
2. is a bitch (by her own admission and she is very proud of it too..read some of her earlier blogs)
3. come across as what one would describe as a 'dumb blonde'...only dumb blondes r supposedly pretty & XX is not..
The list can go on but does one need to say more...???
From her sentence, looks like she knows it but does not want to change. Good point that you quote! There's always at least a 'fuck' in her post. And, no constructive topics from her only criticism. Oh kk, now i see why people really hate her.
Mind me, but i don't go through her long entries. Hais, -.-
there are plenty of other bloggers who use vulgarities.
mr brown, miyagi, rockson tan, shirlyn from the unexpected, kenny sia, finicky feline, SPG..the list goes on.
to anti..
I like to ask why XX is a laughing stock?
hmm.... in my opinion..
you are a laughing stock if you can be so full of yourself, and choose to believe you are better than everyone else, and is the greatest creation by God after Eve and Adam when you have been to only Orchard Road and watch an hour of discovery channel in your entire life time.
there are plenty of other bloggers who use vulgarities.
IMHO, I don't mind to read a blog full of vulgarities if with every "Fuck" word comes with a sensible, intelligent and thought provoking line.
http://www.lalalapom.blogspot.com/
most boring blog ever who uses pics of her niece to drive traffic to her site. yawn :O
I read this blog a couple of times and I'm impressed by her recent chinese entry.
What's wrong with blogging and sharing pics of her niece?
The things they write r so childish that I wonder these r primary sch kids.
You think they are primary school kids? Hmm..you must have grown way too mature for your age.
Anonymous said...
Kenny Sia wrote : "Not by a long shot is she a positive role model for society. Neither are Britney Spears, Jolin Tsai, Paris Hilton or even Angelina Jolie (UN Ambassador/blood swapper/chain smoker/casual sex advocate)."
What a weak line of defense. And to compare WC with the real celebs??!! Has Kenny Sia been taking drugs??
My point exactly. Wendy is such a small, insignificant, poor excuse for a celebrity when compared to those celebrities. I don't understand why ppl are even wasting their time targetting Wendy in that 'Boycott Products Endorsed by Bad Models of Society' when they could target, say Guess, and make a much bigger impact.
[P/S. I know I'm not welcomed here. But I'm going to attempt to initiate an open-minded, civilised, and polite discussion.]
Open-mindedness as in YOU taking pics with a girl who's got her top off. Right? pfftt
okay kenny, you want an honest admission? i hate xiaxue. i am not jealous of her. i just hate her.
there, honest enough?
Anonymous said...
Hmmm wrote, "I'm surprised there are guys who dislike xx, I thought she is the type who is appealing to most guys.."
Well, I am a guy & let me put it this way... If a guy wants to be a laughing stock amongst his friends, and want to drive his parents to their grave earlier....ya, he can bring XX home
Sat Oct 29, 10:34:43 PM 2005
LOL!!!!!!! now that cracked me up! good one!
kennysia,
how is it we're wasting our time? the emails worked, didn't they? her endorsements got pulled, as the screenshots testify.
your point about her being an insignificant, poor excuse for a celebrity is correct. but that doesn't make her unaccountable, nor immune to the appraisal of public, especially since she was appointed as a spokesperson for companies or products.
i'm sure you understand how important it is for the image of the endorser to be synonymous with that of the company represented. xx is a blatantly foul-mouthed and irreverent individual (which is an understatement) and I'm not sure if respectable companies desire to be associated with such a person.
certainly not voxy or kimage.
lol..she's in today sunday times for the wrong reason..! Now she's is "Famous"!
guy, the article was in favour of her.
"on the latest furore, she has supporters from an unlikely source. the society for the physically disabled as well as the handicaps welfare association see nothing wrong with sharing the loos as long as the able-bodied give priority to the disabled."
i don't support anyone in this, but why is wendy's right feet stepping on the toilet cover? not being anal, but couldn't she have posed in another way? it's dirtying the toilet!
IT'S OFFICIAL...
WENDY CHENG (WC) IS THE TOILET QUEEN
She looks stupid posing in the toilet with the typical Ah Lian looks....yet by the looks of it, she appears to be proud of her pose.
Err..did someone ask y WC is a laughing stock?
Kenny Sia wrote "I don't understand why ppl are even wasting their time targetting Wendy in that 'Boycott Products Endorsed by Bad Models of Society' when they could target, say Guess, and make a much bigger impact."
1. I don't understand y u keeping defending her?
2. I don't understand y ppl like u with some common sense can't understand y so many ppl dislike her
3. I don't understand how does brands like 'Guess', even come into the picture
Wow... According to the ST, her 2 endorsement deals are worth a whopping three figures sum. HaHa.. Big Deal!!!
I don't sympathize with Voxy & Kimage... U get what u pay for - u pay shit, u get shit.
tsktsk. what a joke. did paris hilton ever offended us? nah. but xiaxue did. maybe not everyone of you, but me. kenny, you ought to have some brains and think.
Kenny Sia "I don't understand why ppl are even wasting their time targetting Wendy in that 'Boycott Products Endorsed by Bad Models of Society' when they could target, say Guess, and make a much bigger impact."
Kenny, Stop trying to defind ur flawed argument with another flawed argument. U r making urself look stupid.
Along the lines of ur logic, r u suggesting if u see some fights on the street, instead of reporting it to the police, u rather write to President Bush to ask him not to invade Iraq? so as to "make a much bigger impact."
And if u witness a case of an animal abuse, instead of confronting the issue, u'll write to some World Animal Protection Society?? so as to "make a much bigger impact."
Kenny, I thought u r the few bloggers who has a humour and write witty stuff... but with your blind insistence to defend XX with flawed arguments, the opinion of u has gone down a few notches
Voxy & Kimage got a good bargain. They paid fraction of a small peanut (since some peanuts can cost up tp $600k these days), but got a full monkey in Wendy Cheng :)
This gal really amazes me. Doesn't she realize how silly she looks posing in that toilet???
She is really a dumb blonde - well not exactly, as dumb blondes r pretty, she fits only half the definition - the dumb part.
No prize for getting the correct answer :)
How do you drown XX?
Put a scratch-n-sniff sticker at the bottom of a toilet bowl.
Why can't XX dial 911?
She can't find the eleven.
XX was swerving all over the road and driving very badly, so she got pulled over by a police.
The police walked up to her window and asked, "Miss, why are you driving so recklessly?"
XX said, "I'm sorry sir, but wherever I go, there's always a tree in front of me and I can't seem to get away from it!"
The police looked at her and said, "Lady, that's your air freshener!"
She looks fat and her face looks weird. Like smile for the wrong reasons. When she lose 2 endorsements, she also can smile.
Trying to act sexy ..not like her usual blog photos. can't say more...=0
XX was headed to KL. She got on the plane and sat down in business class.
A few minutes later, a flight attendent came up to her and told her that her ticket was for economy and she had to move from the seat. She refused. The flight attendent was persistant, but XX replied, "No, I want to sit here, I've always wanted to see what it is like in business class."
The flight attendent was getting frustrated. Finally, after quite some time, she convinced her to move.
Another passenger who overheard the conversation asked the attendent, "How did you get her to move?"
The flight attendent replied, "I told her that business class doesn't stop in KL."
jo wrote: "guy, the article was in favour of her. "
Yes it was, and either the reporter didn't bother with reading her blog, or he chose to ignore them. Measuring penises and poking fun at sarong party girls? We're not bothered with that; it's her other more controversial stuff like her recent "school vs students blogging" that should be highlighted, 'cos they concern the general public more.
I was quite taken aback by the support she got from the two organisations. Wonder if they actually read what she wrote. It wasn't just about using the toilet--which, had Wendy stated her views in a proper manner, no one would've given her stick--but the way she mocked the disabled.
I will be writing to these two organisations (and the press). This is pathetic, it's like someone just smacked you on the head from behind, smiles nicely at you, and you think it was just a "misunderstanding".
Patheic.
Why didn't the ST quote this:
"As far as I am concerned, you have a physical disability - and that is where you have a disadvantage. Your bladder is working fine isn't it? So you wait, just like normal people do, when there is a queue for the toilet. The rest of us queue up to use a toilet - I don't see why the disabled should be any different."
The dumb bitch does not understand the health problems faced by disabled. The ST article is highly screwed.
XX came home from school one day and said to her mom, 'I can count faster then all the kids in my primary six class, do you think it is because I am smart?'
Her mother replied, 'Of couse it is, dear.'
The next day, XX said, 'I can say the alphabet faster then anyone in my class, do you think it is because I am smart?'
Her mother replied, 'Of course it is dear!'
The next day XX came home from her gymnastics and asked her mother, ''I have a larger chest then all the kids in my class, do you think its because I am smart?'
Her mother replied, 'No dear, I think it is because you are eighteen years old.'
Q: To XX, what is long and hard?
A: Primary Six.
Her mother replied, 'No dear, I think it is because you are eighteen years old.'
Should edit a little, " 'No dear, I think it is because you are twenty-one years old.' Cause 18 years old is a teenager. Still can ask stupid questions. But for her, aiya, the script must change haha.
"I don't think I have projected something that is extreme and i will write exactly the way i've always done."
Any comments? Anyway, it's pretty pointless to talk about disabled toilets. What's the incovenience for normal people to just wait a little longer for the 'normal' toilets. She's too young to even voice up more constructive topics. Should stick to her more pervertic ones. That will suit her personality even more.
XX wrote "Ahhh... They failed, of course, to notice that my virgin entry was meant for insulting my classmates and the 3rd entry had the word "cheebye" in it.
My point is not that I don't have constructive topics and that I scold vulgarities (all the time) of course.....
My blog is not a deep thought-provoking place"
She is Singapore's version of a dumb blonde.
SimpleSandra: I agree with you. What pissed many people off about her blog post was not that she thinks handicapped toilets can be used by able-bodied persons (I'm sure most of us have used one at one point or another), but the way she PHRASED her words. They were mocking, derogatory, and disrespectful.
If the two organisations had read the actual post, they wouldn't even have bothered addressing the "handicapped toilets for public" issue, but would have taken umbrage at the way she worded her post. I bet they were just called up by ST and asked whether it was fine for the public to use those loos, with the reporter giving them little or no idea of what the question is for. They probably took it as just a routine research question from a journalist.
What a seriously skewed article. I'm thinking of writing in too. ST is a joke.
Did I read wrongly? the two endorsement deals added to only 3 figures sum for 3 months? Lets say is the max 3 figures which is $999, that means she is getting a mere $300+- monthly from both companies, each paying only $150+-?!!
Hahahaha.. I thought how much her blog space worth when she speaks so proudly of her endorsement deals hahahahahhaha.... this is really a good laugh! hahahaha
then she does really need to get a job, doesn't she? :)
Let's write to the handicapped associations and ST ba!
Remember to copy and paste her entire entry in the email. It is more than enough to boil blood without us addressing further.
Let's write to the handicapped associations and ST ba!
kyra said...
then she does really need to get a job, doesn't she? :)
------
Whether she wants to get a job is up to her but if she can survive with only a few hundred dollars monthly and spending the dollars on luxuries, that means her basic needs are well taken care of and she isn't poor.
fight fire with fire.
time to let our feelings be known to these two societies. i'm not donating to any disabled charity that supports people insulting the disabled.
What is the email address? Anyone?
"Why is xx a laughing stock?"
You are a laughing stock if you don't see why she is.
Q: What does XX and a beer bottle have in common?
A: They're both empty from the neck up.
You are a laughing stock if you don't see why she is.
You are mean. People are entitled to their opinion. That's why people like you should be hated. I only ASK. K? Anyway, we are all human. Some people should not be treated so cruelly although i admit i hate her at 1 time.
You are a laughing stock if you don't see why she is.
PS, you are much more of a shit than XX. At least she is better than you. More famous even if it's in the wrong way
The Disabled People's Association Singapore
dpa@dpa.org.sg
Handicaps Welfare Association
hwa@hwa.org.sg
Q. How do you confuse XX?
A. You don't have to. She is born that way.
I wrote...
You are a laughing stock if you don't see why she is.
anti said...
You are mean. People are entitled to their opinion. That's why people like you should be hated. I only ASK. K? Anyway, we are all human. Some people should not be treated so cruelly although i admit i hate her at 1 time.
I'm the one who wrote that. You are as sensitive. I only answer the question asked and this answer is not implying YOU are.
You feel offended just by a sentence I wrote which is not directed to you, so you should be able to understand why there are so many people hating her.
anti said..
PS, you are much more of a shit than XX. At least she is better than you. More famous even if it's in the wrong way
How much you know about me that you can claimed that I'm more of a shit than XX? I'm interested to know this.
Thank you Kyra. Time to flex some power in words liao
XX ordered a pizza and the waiter asked if he should cut it in 4 or 6 pieces.
"4, please. I could never eat 6 pieces."
Don't know la. I don't wish to quarrel. bye bye and have a nice day. I thought you are talking about me mah. C you
Hi guys I just updated.
You can carry on the discussion in the new entry.
How much you know about me that you can claimed that I'm more of a shit than XX? I'm interested to know this.
0% anyway, ive not seen her real life so by internet. How she talks. Same like the people here
Why did XX climb up to the roof of the bar?
She heard that the drinks were on the house.
anti said...
Don't know la. I don't wish to quarrel. bye bye and have a nice day. I thought you are talking about me mah. C you
I'm not quarreling with you. I have not even used any profanities and insulted you for things that you have not said or things that you have not done and is enough to agitate you. I'm even here waiting nicely for your explaination on why you think I'm more shit than xx when you don't even know me.
Imagine if you are insulted by me the way she insulted others? Or you are accused by the way you accused others which is passing rude comments and comparing people whom you don't even know?
She insulted people whom she doesn't even know in person or attempt to hear their point of views.
This is one of the reason why people hated her. Put "yourself" in others shoes before "you" point fingers to others.
In case you are sensitive again, the "yourself" and "you" is not implying YOU. It is generalization.
She should really have a taste of her own medicine but obviously it doesn't work as she is too self-absorbed.
'What is the email address? Anyone? '
Handicaps Welfare Society
hwa@hwa.org.sg
Society for the Physically Disabled
information@spd.org.sg
be polite. ;)
KK, sorry. I didn't mean to say that -.- but i thought you were scolding me a laughing stock and i did not read your quote carefully or wadeva. Bored......No expaination. But whoever scold me of course is to me a worse shit than XX. Not that i know them but if anyone gets angry will think this way too..i don't know if this post makes any sense to you. But....should stop here.
Having read almost all the blogs that are involved in the "toilet for disabled' issue and the emails and replies to/from the sponsors of 'Xiaxue', I am convinced beyond any reasonable doubt that human kind is basically vicious, malicious, wicked, evil, cruel,unforgiving, selfish, and greedy, among other beastly traits.
I'm not a blogger, but I do read a variety of good blogs from all over the world; I'm a fan of nobody and this is my first ever response to any blog. It is easier to sum up this over-blown issue in point form :
1) Expressing one's opinion about the usage of a toilet cubicle for the disabled is absolutely a non-issue; even the usage of such toilet by an abled person is not a crime or an offence, unless it's made a law, such as cruelty to animal for example.
2) Having expressed her reasons and opinion on the topic, she is, of course, open to dissenting views, such as the hundreds of responses I read here and elsewhere. BUT, dissenters should only express or counter with evidences within the boundaries of the laws so as not to be accused of slanders or defamations subsequently.
3) Obviously, the issue is now over-blown and will snowball given the fact that the dark side of human kind normally prevails. That's why we have to resort to the laws of the land from time to time.
4) The "boycott products" campaign and the mails written to the sponsors of "xiaxue" can have no valid justifications other than to break her rice bowl so to speak. This I really find hard to accept because it is pure wickedness, malice and jealousy. To add insult to readers, these people say they are doing it for the younger generation, our children ! There is even one who declares himself a Roman Catholic on his site ! To him, I ask where is his sense of forgiveness and Catholic values (Remember Pope John Paul II and his would-be assassin ?) I'm not anti-Catholic as I'm one myself, but I am ashamed of his actions.
5) It amuses me everytime I read remarks (I can't remember exact words) about her "not toning down her offensive words..", "..this being the second time she insulted people..", "..her language is vulgar..", "..she is anti-christian.."..why the sponsors are not taking actions yet.." and a host of others humorous statements. This clearly shows that these people either do have vengence in mind or are sadistically cruel. In that case, there is no point debating on the issue because no reasoning will hold.
6) It is hard not to notice that there are many, who in the words of some Malaysian bloggers, second class Malaysian citizens who are so keen in this "toilet" topic of the Singapore blogsphere. Is joining in this fracas gaining you more traffic to hope for future endorsements ? The idea is good provided their actions are not malicious or tainted with ulterior motives. But I just wonder why they, including those living abroad in places such as Perth,Australia, don't concentrate their efforts to write and campaign for a more equal status back home for their children's sake ?
7) It is also strange to note that even non-asian, a british national, is actively involved, not in a manner expected of him, coming from a country that preaches human rights and other high-level virtues. He seems to be snooping here and there and planting seeds of hatred and factionalism to achieve his ends. I hope he won't create another "opium war".
8) All said and done, it is best to know where to draw one's line. Any action has a reation as sure as the sun must rise. I won't be surprised if archives of concerned blogs are already downloaded and saved for a close scrutiny to discover any offensive remarks requiring official complaints or legal actions. If nothing at all, there is such a thing as retribution or karma which will befall on the wicked and evil ones, not so much on themselves, but on their most beloved - that is even more painful.
xialanxue,
I'm new to your blog. How come you don't put up a photo of youself for viewer to see. Neither are there basic info about yourself. I am sure it is not too much for readers to know at least who the writer is and what he or she stands for.
simple sandra, why are you such a busybody? jo was talking to guy, not you. and she's not even supporting xx!
to the anon who left the comment on Sun Oct 30, 05:10:21 PM 2005 with all your points, you rock! :)
to that anon with the long points, perhaps u can never understand how it feels unless u are a disabled person. I was in a wheelchair for 2 months once cos I was recovering from quite a serious car accident. I have learnt to appreciate those things that we have taken for granted and I know how hard it is for a disabled person. Don't chuck it away like it's a non-issue. It is a big deal and society should pay more attention to it and should not condone what xiaxue said.
From a malaysian blogger:-
http://www.brandmalaysia.com/
A picture is worth a thousand wrong words.
When I first saw the image (picture above) that accompanied the article, I cringed. The pose looked like one from medieval art, where the knight stood proudly on the head of a dragon that he had slained a moment before. (Thanks Suanie for the email).
It was on purpose, and I can tell you this much, the people at Straits Times Singapore aren't by any measure dumb. They knew exactly what they were doing and they had a rather good idea what it would make bloggers look like. A bunch of infantile and rowdy people who fight about toilets. Granted, the issue is more than mere toilets, but look at the end result.
And people say they are defending Wendy. I beg to differ. It speaks about the issue far more than what the written article can.
The fact is this issue is more than just about toilets. The disagreement stems from a difference of opinion on using toilets specially designated for the disabled. You know, the ones that has a picture of a person on a wheelchair on it, just in case some of us cannot read.
Arguments can ensue anywhere, and is not restricted to only in blogosphere. I have an anecdote to share as well. On a busy weekend in a shopping complex in Singapore, I slipped into the men's room for a leak. As I towelled dry my hand, I saw a gentleman leaving a toilet cubicle with the little wheelchair sign on it. As he opened the door, I looked at the other cubicles, which was empty. I remarked as such, and the fine gentleman quipped back, "Why you so angry, you spastic issit?"
Wonderful.
If I had returned a verbal broadside, I bet crap would not be coming out from merely our anus on that day, so I moved on and let the remark slide. Besides — from his retort — I justified to myself that he was a retard and hence being also disabled in a way, had every right to the cubicle he emerged from.
This is not to say that Singaporeans are bad. Malaysians can be much worse. Some of us would not leave it at merely a verbal salvo, things could get 'physical'. It's not about where you come from, it's about how you behave. That's what Peter Tan is trying to say, and Wendy has every right to have her own opinions. The question of why she is famous, or well read does not occur. I know more people who recognise the name Ron Jeremy over say, Oscar Wilde. (Ron Jeremy, incidentally has a Masters degree, which I believe he collected.)
However, trust Straits Times Singapore to subtely paint blogosphere in a monochromatic light, with the headline "All flushed over toilet blog."
Fundamentally what is being communicated is, we are all the same in varying intensity and the flame wars are normally all about WHO is right, not WHAT is being advanced in the course of the disagreement. The issue was not the issue, but the bloggers, and therein lies the flaw in said piece of journalism.
People disagree all the time, and on every subject. It happens in the boardrooms, in family living rooms, heck it even happens in the bedroom. I am not saying it's not newsworthy, if you notice the press highlights the name calling in Malaysian parliament with more veracity than the issues discussed within. We have a strange fascination with other people fighting. Look at the crowd that gathers in a bar fight. I'll pay good money to watch Wendy fight Peter in Nouvo.
However, the 'civic-minded' Straits Times Singapore could have used the sensationalism produced by this argument to look at the issue. The larger picture is the way countries in the ASEAN cluster generally have people who are rather apathetic to the plight of the disabled. It's almost like we don't want to see them. We throw millions to victims of natural disasters, shed a tear occasionally for the child who loses his parents and gets his sober face plastered on the news, but do not bother about the greater issue of trying to make these people's lives more productive.
This argument can be used to bring that issue to light. It's not merely about Wendy's right to crap in a toilet designated for the disabled. If she sees herself as such, who are we to question it? Well, Peter did, and he felt compelled to write to Wendy's sponsors about her attitude. People who did not like Wendy in the first place latched on and it became a flame war, and that's just that.
But look closely at where the chaos is leading us. Those of us who are not fixated on putting one or the other down, may be thinking about the disabled now, and along the way learn more about their plight and the apathy they have to face, not only about where to pee, but how they live life and interact with society.
In my opinion, they both won. That's the powerful nature of blogs. They bring a discussion or a disagreement to a wider audience, who will have to ponder about the issues, besides merely being the instrument of an A-list blogger's astroturfing mechanism.
Socially responsible journalism should look at advancing the issue. It's not that they must not play on the sensationalism, in fact it's mandatory that they do. At the end of the day, the posturing matters, and where they lead public opinion towards determines the great from the mediocre.
In that aspect, Straits Times Singapore has proven itself, in this case, to be mediocre. An opportunity presented itself to bring the discourse to a destination where the plight of our disabled breathren could be contemplated, instead they focused on two bloggers, toilets and places to get your hair and nails done. Oh, let's not forget the guy who will obviously sell more t-shirts as well.
Unless the article was written to make blogosphere look petty, inconsequential and nonsensical. In that, they were a runaway success. A corporate entity that does not fully comprehend how to harness the potential that blogs can offer their brand, will be put off by the incident and continue channeling the media spend to traditional means, and perhaps, just perhaps, that is what it's all about.
In communicating 'screw the bloggers', they screwed the disabled, messed up a great opportunity to seed public thought on issues pertaining to these disabled people and worked it in such a manner that a print ad sounds so much more reasonable than investing in bloggers, many whom are incidentally a closer touchpoint to consumers than they can ever hope to be.
Way to go.
haha ur sucha loser
Look, Kenny Sia,
Paris Hilton doesn't write trash like Singapore's very own Water Closet aka Wendy Cheng does.
And even if she does, at least she doesn't show it to the world. And always claims she's right.
WC's not good at writing. She's only good at pulling off the oh-i-come-from-a-single-parent-family,-oh-my-brother's-so-young silly act.
Yet even her so-called forte is but mere crap to us, her audience.
and don't give me bull about WC writing what she likes and not giving a care about who reads her blog. it's because of us, readers, that she's who she is today.
Post a Comment